1st Circuit Rules on GPS and Warrants

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in United States v. Sparks, et al., contemplated the recent SCOTUS ruling in US v. Jones before ruling that evidence obtained as a result of a warrantless placement of a global positioning system device on a car could be admitted at trial.

Via RI Lawyers Weekly:

The defendants argued that, under the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in United States v. Jones, the federal agents’ use of the GPS tracker was a Fourth Amendment “search” that required a warrant.

The 1st Circuit, however, found the evidence admissible pursuant to the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule articulated by the Supreme Court in the 2011 case of Davis v. United States.

Davis’s good-faith exception is not a license for law enforcement to forge ahead with new investigative methods in the face of uncertainty as to their constitutionality,” Judge Norman H. Stahl wrote for the unanimous court. “The good-faith exception is, however, properly applied in cases like this one (or Davis itself), where new developments in the law have upended the settled rules on which the police relied.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s