Independent medical exams remain a controversial issue between parties in personal injury and workers’ compensation cases.
After The New York Times published a series of articles at the end of March looking into independent medical exams in the state of New York, lawyers across the country began talking about the contentious issues surrounding IMEs.
One major issue is that “there are only so many doctors [who do IMEs] out there and we tend to see the same folks over and over again,” said Ronald V. Miller, a partner at the Law Offices of Miller & Zois in Baltimore, Md. who focuses his plaintiffs’ work on serious motor vehicle accidents, products liability and medical malpractice cases.
Kenneth L. Shigley, a partner at Chambers, Aholt & Rickard in Atlanta, agreed. He refers to the exams as DMEs, or “defense medical exams,” on his blog, the Atlanta Injury Law and Civil Litigation blog.
“In my experience, insurance companies and defense lawyers always want to use a doctor whose view of things is pretty reliable and predictable as pro-defense,” he said. “There are some doctors who make it their main source of income to do these exams and who are notorious in the area.”
But Ronald G. Stephenson, a partner at Bullivant Houser Bailey in Portland, Ore., who has practiced insurance defense for more than 30 years, said that the “frequent flyer” system of attorney-doctor relationships works both ways.
“Plaintiffs’ attorneys will steer their clients to certain doctors” looking for the response their case needs, he said. “That’s the game that is being played.”
Miller acknowledged that both sides of the bar have relationships with doctors.
“It’s foolish to deny that there are biases on both sides,” he said. But, he claimed, “the bias is more pronounced on the defense side.”
Plaintiffs’ attorneys can take advantage of that bias, he suggested, by making jurors aware of it.
“We have to continue to put the issue before the jury. They generally get it right,” Miller said.
Search Closing Argument
- Listen to Audio in Sports Betting Case – Murphy vs. NCAA
- 1st Circuit rules in favor of gay marriage in Puerto Rico case
- Attorney General Peter Kilmartin to Recognize National Crime Victims’ Rights Week with Victims’ Grove Ceremony
- Photo ID Required – Rhode Island Primary Elections 2014
- Chicago Pizza, RICO and the Politics of Development
- Court Denies Motion to add Cities and Towns to Rhode Island State Pension Lawsuit
- Rhode Islander sues Cristiano Ronaldo over CR7
- RI Hispanic Bar Association Meet and Greet
- Federal Court: Warwick City Worker Prohibited from US Senate run
- Supreme Court decides Whistleblower Case in Rhode Island
Blog CloudAttorney General Closing Arguments Congressional District 1 Constitutional Law Consumer Criminal Law Culture Elections Law Ethics First Circuit Gratuitous Self Promotion health care MA Courts MA Politics Marriage Equality medical malpractice Modern Culture National Civil Rights National Courts National Economy National Politics RI Courts RI Crime RI Politics SCORI SCOTUS Technology Trial Strategies Uncategorized Workers Rights